Portable computers (by alaric)

I like the iPad hardware; shame about the crippled iOS software. Similarly, I like the Kindle hardware - shame about the restrictive DRM system.

But the biggest shame is that I'm actually tempted to own three or more different computing devices, purely because of different situational specialisations in the hardware. A smartphone (or, more ideally, a wearable computer) for real-time pervasive tasks. A tablet device for portably viewng stuff on (whether it's ideally electronic ink or a nice colour LCD really depends on what I'm viewing) . A laptop for actually working on... ideally a small one for portability and a larger one for power (both in terms of CPU+RAM and in terms of more screen real estate). Plus remote servers that store a significant part of my data since it needs to be available to others in some way (this blog, my email, etc).

But this sucks - there's a lot of duplication of hardware (mass storage and CPU power) there, when I'll only really be using one device at a time. And there's an annoying duplication of data that needs to be "synched" between things. And an annoying variation of user interface, as different devices often have very different models of storage management.

Here's what I'd love to have:

In my pocket sits a smartphone. It might have a Blackberry-style keyboard or an iPhone-style touchscreen, depending on taste. It has a small computer to run its apps, and a battery, and the usual Bluetooth/USB/GSM/etc interfaces. And it has a wodge of Flash to store my stuff.

Maybe it has enough Flash to store all my stuff. Maybe it doesn't in which case, I might also carry a featureless cuboid that contains batteries and a lot of flash, or even a hard disk, or some combination of the two. In which case, my phone is slaved to it - using its own internal flash to cache resources fetched from the storage box, and accessing it via Bluetooth or some more advanced personal-area radio network; but when it's plugged into the storage box via USB, it can access it more speedily, and suckle power from the larger battery.

Perhaps I'm lucky enough to also possess a head-up display (which also functions as a headset for audio), and/or a chord keyer, that talk to the smartphone via radio or wired links. They're just extra I/O devices that plug into it, though.

But maybe I own a tablet computer, or an electronic paper device. They might have their own internal storage, but I'd slave them to my phone, or direct to my storage box (slaving to the phone, if the phone is slaved to the storage box, just slaves them to the storage box, in effect), and use their local flash as a cache. Also, if I don't like their file-browsing interfaces, I can just use the phone to select a file and "send" it to any willing device reachable through the slaving relationships, which causes it to access the file (from the original source) and open it up. The file isn't actually "sent", it just seems that way (except faster, and with a single central copy if I start editing it).

But what of the laptop? Or my big, powerful, desktop machine? Let them be slaved to my phone or my storage box, too. Take my home directory and installed apps from my central storage. Then there's no synching of address books and all that. There might be files in my phone that only laptop-scale software can manage, which I then can't open on the go, but I can at least use my portable devices to email a copy to a colleague who needs one, and to open simpler types of files that happen to be associated with the same project. They can talk to my storage box via a wireless link within range, or I can hook my storage box, phone, etc. up to it via cables for high-speed communications and power distribution.

What will it take to do this? Some cleverness to negotiate which device should give which power when they're joined by a cable (easy if one of them has access to mains power, trickier to decide if they're both battery devices; perhaps the default should be to not share power at all unless asked to by the user or unless the battery of one device is flat, turning it into a non-self-powered device). But it's mainly down to standardising file systems and protocols. Working at the "USB mass storage device" level is a bad idea, as only one device can have such a filesystem mounted. It needs to be more like NFS. And, mainly, devices and desktop OSes need to let go of managing their own filesystem and learn to use a shared standard for home directory layout - which will NEVER happen for legacy systems, but at least they can mount your mobile data store as "My Documents" or something like that, and perhaps make some effort to invisibly sync between their own personal-information databases and whatever's in there.

There'll still be some need for syncing - my email and blog, and shared work stuff like Git repos and group calendars, have to be on servers somewhere. And there's a good reason to mirror my portable storage to somewhere else whenever I can, as a backup. But the less syncing, the better!

First Day Back (by sarah)

It's Jean's first day back at school today - she is actually five now!

I made sure we had everything ready last night and we where ready in plenty of time until it came time to leave and I discovered I'd completely forgotten lunch!

Anyway she got to school ok - she was very impatient this morning to get there and instantly disappeared into the playground with the other kids.

The only thing was I had to write a letter to the school about the library book they had sent Jean home with over the summer - it was a big book of bible stories and crafts and also some little 'moral' stories and true stories. It was these latter two that made me decide to censor it.

They were absolutely awful 🙁 with implications that those who had been abused in the Nazi Death/Work/War Camps were not protected by God because they didn't hold secret bible meetings :/ And many similar things, including a child in what I would call a mentally abusive situation trying to gain some self respect only to be hit back down because they 'stole' from the parents :/

I'm sorry I just could not read this to my child. And because these bits where hidden in the 'side-boxes' I don't think the school had any idea what it was like either. I was highly unimpressed.

Jean’s Dino Extravaganza! (by sarah)

Saturday saw Jean's fifth birthday and it was dinosaur themed!

I haven't got all the photo's yet but here are a couple to be getting on with 🙂

Mum made Jean a triceratops outfit from Sew a Dinosaur a book I picked up in a charity shop 🙂 It is a fantastic outfit and came out better than in the book (she made some adjustments!).

We had dinosaur biscuits 🙂 Jean made!

And a Dinosaur and Volcano cake!

Jean announced that I am the Bestest Baker in the whole world when she saw the cake 🙂

We also had volcano cupcakes!

Food wise there were also over 90 dino cupcakes with either flintstones or jelly dinosaurs on them! And dinosaur shapes sandwiches and little dino chocs me and Jean spent three days making!

Me and Jean also made Hama dinosaurs as decorations 🙂

Jean also decorated lots of cardboard dinos as decorations 🙂 These also appeared in the Dino make and do along with stickers and cloth party bags for the kids to decorate!

We had a pre-historic safari where we found a mother load of dino goodies 🙂 (even if the kids didn't believe that Alaric was a real trail leader especially once Rob turned up in his National Geographic gear!). There were a few party games and the Land Before Time I, II and III for the kids to watch in the evening 🙂

I was a little bit behind with putting the food out and forgot I had made Jelly and ice-creams for the kids but think it went well 🙂 Jean liked it anyway 🙂

Chris Al-Asward (by sarah)

Last night I leaned of some sad news, Chris Al-Asward also known as Lethe Bashar died in July just after his 31st birthday. This came as a bit of a shock as I was just wondering where he had got too so went to check his twitter profile. Being the brains and drive behind Escape Into Life I hadn't noticed a complete absence as his other twitter account was still going strong being the one that drove his EIL project.

On his profile page was a tweet saying he had tragically died 🙁 I couldn't believe it and felt crushed at the same time and then that sinking feeling of - do I have the right to be this upset - after all I have never met him in the flesh. He lives the other side of the world but he had found me on twitter and had encouraged me in the realms of art and writing.

When I have pain flare ups I sometimes cannot sleep and he was often there to talk too. I started my art journal because of a side project he started with the idea of it being sold in the EIL shop. I've took far longer on this than I have expected but I love working on the Art/Visual Poetry Journal.

It is also through him that I found The Flying Trilobite a young artist who seeks to combine science and art, I can't remember but I think he was profiled on EIL. And it was then through him I found the paleo-art site Art Evolved finially giving me a way to combine the two parts of me - The Artist and the Scientist.

Part of my anguish last night was having not noticed that someone I regually talk to was gone, I know the last few months have been pretty much a wipe out for me but still 🙁 Also as Alaric agreed with me - what of his books? His work? His Art? His Creations? What would happen to them?

I have been told since that there are plans to publish these and everyone is working hard to mantain the websites. The is also a Prize in the pipelines The Chris Al-Asward Prize for braking down the barriers in the arts.

I did cry and it made me realise that my definition of friendship is probably quiet different from most peoples. I am sad that Chris is gone. I spent last night trying to track down all his sites and stuff - getting stumped for a while until I remembered he'd gotten rid of one of his twitter accounts and stuff like that.

I also signed his memorial book.

TYCHRIS

Blood Donation Stupidness (by sarah)

As some of you know I can't give blood due to having had a blood transfusion myself in the past - this is a newish rule and I have given blood in the past but I understand that there are risks of human mad-cow disease and things and these where becoming concentrated by the fact that those most likely to give blood are those who have had a life saved by it.

I personally would have died aged 4 and half without blood so am very keen to encourage people to donate. I try regually to get Al to go but after an initial issue of him being underwieght (for his height) he has just been too whimpy.

Then a friend of mine pointed out he couldn't give blood though being perfectly healthy - the problem? His sexuality.

(Warning I do obviously now talk about sex and things in the post.)

Know anal sex runs a higher risk of bleeding and therefore fluids mixing compared with virginal sex. So I always assumed the rules would be like - if you have had unprotected anal sex not for six months or something like that but it's not.

The exclusion is on men who have anal or oral sex with other men as they are a higher risk group for viruses that live in the blood. But hang on a minute HIV is spreading rapidly through the hetrosexual population and erm... what about women having anal sex with men and for that matter oral sex with men?

I could find no reference to them only if you've had sex with a man who's had sex with another man - but erm... that is assuming they would actually have told you? And then the restriction is 12 months before giving blood.

Prostitutes fall under the catagory of never give blood too. But what of say someone just sleeping around that is not mentioned plus they say all the blood is tested and they are always short of blood. There is no distinction over weather condoms are used for 'gay' sex. Why I wonder - last I checked they were still number one for reliability and protection. A woman on the pill who sleeps around I would have thought would be a higher risk than say men who have had say three boyfriends ever?

I don't have the statistics so I can't say for sure - but they are also lumping everyone/man together here. Though they are saying it's only men who have been sexually active with other men but there are different life styles.

Ok so the viruses such as HIV and hep. aren't detectable in early infection so leave that buffer zone of 12 months since unprotected sex or exclude everyone who have ever had anal sex or oral sex with a man! And that would include a large proportion of women!

I understand that this may result in more blood being taken that subsequently can not be used but would that out weigh the amount of usable blood you would get?

I wonder what the EU and other countries rule on this one and weather getting their transmittion data would be helpful here?

I may have missed it but I didn't see any restrictions on women having unprotected sex :/ Of any kind!